top of page
Search

BUILDING FOR THE FUTURE: A Hybrid Approach to Construction in Los Angeles

Writer: Maulaen ManiyarMaulaen Maniyar

The construction industry stands at a crossroads, where material comparisons, cost and weight analysis, fire and seismic resistance, and evolving building techniques demand a reevaluation of traditional methods. This article presents an insightful and engaging perspective on these factors, encouraging industry professionals to explore a hybrid construction approach that combines the strengths of wood and concrete. The ultimate goal? To rebuild Los Angeles in a way that ensures long-term resilience and sustainability.


Bridging Two Worlds: A Personal Perspective

Having studied and practiced architecture in both India and California, I have witnessed firsthand the differences in construction methodologies shaped by regional resources, workforce capabilities, and environmental demands.

In India, construction predominantly relies on concrete, brick, and stone, with material choice dictated by budget and site conditions. Labor is often unskilled, and access to advanced electric hand tools can be limited. During my undergraduate studies, I trained at the Auroville Earth Institute, gaining experience in innovative construction techniques such as wire-cut earth bricks, free-spanning arches, ferro-cement, and rammed earth construction. Professionally, I contributed to institutional and luxury residential projects, primarily using concrete and brick.

Conversely, in California, wood-frame construction dominates due to its seismic resilience, the availability of sustainably sourced timber, and a well-established industry ecosystem that supports its use. However, as we look toward the future, some builders are revisiting a material that has been integral to construction worldwide—concrete. Despite its durability, concrete has not been widely adopted in California’s residential sector due to factors such as high initial costs, poor insulation properties (due to no-air gap details), and aesthetic limitations. Additionally, concrete construction typically requires longer build times, further deterring widespread use.


Overcoming the Barriers to Concrete Construction

Recent innovations in concrete technology are addressing these challenges. New materials and construction techniques are reducing costs, making concrete homes financially competitive with wood-frame structures. When factoring in long-term considerations such as maintenance, insurance, and overall durability, concrete construction presents a compelling case for a lower total cost of ownership.

One of the most pressing concerns driving material choice today is climate change. Rising global temperatures and shifting weather patterns have led to an increase in natural disasters, particularly wildfires. As a professional working in California, I have developed an in-depth understanding of wall assemblies and seismic retrofits, as well as hurricane-resistant roofing systems. My pro bono efforts with Habitat for Humanity further reinforced the importance of resilient construction in disaster-prone areas.


The Need for a Balanced Approach

While no material can provide absolute protection against severe natural disasters, the goal should be to extend the lifespan and durability of structures while ensuring occupant safety and preserving the building’s contents.

A hybrid approach—leveraging the seismic flexibility of wood and the fire resistance and durability of concrete—could be the key to creating structures that withstand the test of time and environmental extremes.

This article serves as a think piece, encouraging professionals in the building industry to consider innovative hybrid solutions that integrate the best of both materials. By combining wood’s adaptability and sustainability with concrete’s strength and longevity, we can build a more resilient Los Angeles—one that does not require rebuilding time and time again.


It is my hope that this information sparks new ideas and inspires thoughtful approaches to construction. The future of sustainable and disaster-resistant architecture depends on rethinking traditional methods and embracing innovation.

Let this be a catalyst for change in your future projects.

 
 
 

Comments


bottom of page